JoAnnFarb.com
  • Home
  • video
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • recipes
  • About
    • About/Podcasts and Videos
    • Contact
    • presentations
  • Resources

If  You Value Peace and Justice, Why Spend Any Time Justifying Violence Against Other Beings?

8/10/2016

4 Comments

 
Picture
I have been told it is offensive when I suggest there are ethical problems inherent in consuming animal products no matter how well the animals are supposedly treated.  I have been told that in touting the science showing a whole-foods vegan diet can prevent or reverse our most common killers, while producing fewer greenhouse gasses and using less water than one based upon meat and dairy I am demonizing those with medical conditions that require them to eat meat.  
 
I realize that there are individuals for whom the benefits of meat eating outweigh the risks, like, children with severe epilepsy not helped by drugs.  When they are put on a ketogenic diet (consuming no carbs and just eating meat and dairy) they have fewer seizures.  Although not without serious long-term hazards, compared to the certainty of continuous seizures --the long term risk of all that animal protein, pales in comparison.  Who cares about cancer, heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis and kidney disease down the road, when they are just trying to have a little time without any seizures?  But I disagree that in providing the honest facts about the many harms of meat and dairy, I am demonizing those with no better options.
 
In the not-too-distant future, we will likely have lab grown meat that could be sustainably produced without needing to exploit any more animals.  Like the genetically engineered human insulin that enables diabetics to live without killing pigs for insulin, lab-grown meat could provide a non-violent alternative.
 
But the question we should be asking is why are rare examples of people for whom the benefits of meat and dairy may outweigh the risks being used to silence those pushing  for a non-violent change?  It's similar to the argument that since Inuits living in remote regions, probably couldn’t survive without eating meat, it is somehow an injustice to suggest that the rest of us should.
 
There may be some people with particular health issues – rare genetic disorders, or allergies to every known plant, who really couldn’t survive without eating animals, but for the vast majority of humans, not only is that not the case – but overwhelming amounts of data, suggest that the current demand for meat and dairy, is posing a very real threat to the continued survival of humanity.  Furthermore, it is important to recognize that situations such as these may be excusable based on the circumstances, but something that is excusable can still be morally wrong. For example, if two humans were stranded on a desert island and one canabilized that other to survive, we would recognize that this is excusable due to the circumstances, yet at the same time it would still be morally wrong because it involved killing someone against their will. What is fundamentally important though, is that most people already agree that it is wrong to unnecessarily cause harm to animals.  And if you think it's wrong to kick a dog just for fun, then it's also wrong to eat meat and dairy just because they taste good. If we can live healthfully without eating meat and dairy, eating these things means we ARE unnecessarily harming animals
 
So I don't understand why people who say they value peace and justice, would spend any time trying to justify or defend continued exploitation of animals for meat, dairy or eggs, which require us to engage in intentional, violence against other beings.  If the time and money being spent to try to justify this outdated, violent tradition, were instead used to figure out how to help those few who really do have legitimate challenges to being vegan, we would all be much better off.

4 Comments
Gracia Fay Ellwood link
8/16/2016 10:44:49 am

I think Carol Adams is right--people who make such accusations are mostly fighting their own better selves, because they don't want to face the fact that they are not living by their own professed values. It's more comfortable to accuse animal activists than themselves. But I was more or less in that situation years ago, and time--or God/dess--worked wonders. There's hope.

Reply
JoAnn Farb
8/16/2016 12:03:48 pm

Thank you Gracia. I am glad to hear that things got better for you too.

Interestingly -- amidst the "push back" in my town, I am meeting more and more people who call themselves vegan, and in most cases, they know nothing of the rich history of this movement, and a few have even told me that they don't even know any other vegans here in town -- and yet something has moved them to do this.

I do believe we may be closer to a tipping point than we realize.

Reply
Rhonda
8/17/2016 10:43:40 am

Hi JoAnn, I so appreciate the work that you do to bring awareness of the injustices done to animals in our communities.
Since you mentioned the rarity of animal foods for children with seizures, I was wondering your thoughts on the CNN programs on marijuana? There have been 3 series on it called Weed, here is one:http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/07/health/charlotte-child-medical-marijuana/
I thought I would ask you since you have a background in pharmaceuticals.
Thank you again for the hard work you do in bringing awareness of our dietary choices.

Kindly ~ Rhonda

Reply
JoAnn Farb
8/17/2016 12:04:21 pm

Hi Rhonda:

Thank you for your supportive words. I have not watched the CNN programs (I have limited internet) but did here something about this issue on NPR awhile ago. While I believe that Marijuana is NOT a harmless substance, I think it is quite likely LESS HARMFUL than most of the other options that modern medicine has for children with the worst forms of epilepsy. As a general rule, I absolutely believe that parents, who have carefully researched what is best for their child, should not be prevented from acting on their conscience -- and we should be especially careful -- about forcing or preventing parents from making parenting decisions that are opposed by large moneyed interests. (Which seems to be the only examples I can think of when well-meaning, conscientous parent's choices are legally challenged.)

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Click to learn why people Fail on plant-based diets

    Categories

    All
    Environment
    Health
    Parenting
    Recipes
    Social Justice

    My Best Articles are HERE
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.