The big tech companies claim they are merely removing things that are not true -- but Sanjay Gupta, Nina Shapiro and others aligned with those who hold the power are not getting censored -- even when they say things that can be shown to be factually incorrect. Here is a good example.
Nina Shapiro exemplifies Brave New World.
"The dissolution of herd immunity...is...contributing to resurgence of...pertussis, measles, tetanus, and diphtheria."
Tetanus is not a communicable disease.
The vaccine for Diphtheria is a toxoid --- so there is not even a theoretical basis to suggest that it can prevent the spread of the organism that causes diphtheria.
And the published science on the Pertussis vaccine not only provides ZERO evidence that this vaccine prevents the spread of the disease --- in fact it is well documented that people properly vaccinated for pertussis can have and spread the illness -- and often don't show any symptoms!
(So only one of the four diseases she mentions -- measles -- is there even a theoretical basis to suggest herd immunity, and we had over 1200 measles cases in the US last year -- and there was not a single death. Measles is not deadly in well-fed populations.)
I notice a disturbing double standard by some of my scientist and doctor friends when it comes to medical information like this.
When I share information that challenges their perspective (particularly on the subject of vaccines) many look at it only long enough to find a single detail they can point to, to discredit the entire article -- even when the detail might not be central to the evidence being presented. But they take the opposite approach to sources that support what they already believe....like this one I just deconstructed by Nina Shaprio.
previous post -- comparing COVID-19 to POLIO